- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat LX830C vs. John Deere 853J
Tigercat LX830C vs. John Deere 853J
3 reasons to buy Tigercat LX830C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 219 kW | 2 % more or 4.7 kW |
Booms
| Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm and 5000 mm | 35 % less or 1750 mm |
6 reasons to buy John Deere 853J:
Sizes
| Clearance | 739 mm and 710 mm | 4 % more or 29 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 310.4 l. and 165 l. | 47 % more or 145.4 l. |
| Operational weight without attachment | 26675.8 kg and 32660 kg | 18 % less or 5984.2 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 1116.7 l. and 530 l. | 53 % more or 586.7 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Booms
| Maximum cutting radius | 8400 mm and 8380 mm | 0 % more or 20 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3330 mm and 3170 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm and 3780 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and John Deere |
| Model | QSL9 and 6081H |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 215 mm and 203.2 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 609.6 mm |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 4585 kg and 6431.9 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3170 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3780 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 710 mm | 5. Clearance | 739 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm |
Booms
| 9. Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 5000 mm |
| 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8380 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8400 mm |