vs.

      Tigercat LX830C vs. John Deere 909J

      5 reasons to buy Tigercat LX830C:

      Operation

      Operational weight without attachment 32660 kg and 34427.7 kg 5 % less or 1767.7 kg
      Generator current strength 110 amperes and 80 amperes 27 % more or 30 amperes

      Motor

      Full power 223.7 kW and 219.2 kW 2 % more or 4.5 kW

      Booms

      Maximum cutting radius 8380 mm and 8360 mm 0 % more or 20 mm
      Minimum cutting radius 3250 mm and 5030 mm 35 % less or 1780 mm

      4 reasons to buy John Deere 909J:

      Sizes

      Clearance 770 mm and 710 mm 8 % more or 60 mm

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 1116.7 l. and 530 l. 53 % more or 586.7 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 310.4 l. and 165 l. 47 % more or 145.4 l.

      Motor

      Power measured at 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min 5 % more or 100 rev

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Height to cab upper part 3730 mm and 4000 mm
      Overall width 3330 mm and 3330 mm

      Operation

      Operating voltage 24 V and 24 V

      Motor

      Manufacturer Cummins and John Deere
      Model QSL9 and 6081H

      Carrier

      Caterpillar track pitch 215 mm and 216 mm
      Shoe dimensions 610 mm and 609.6 mm

      Booms

      Pin lifting at maximum radius 4585 kg and 6432 kg

      Alignment device

      Front end 26 degrees and 7 degrees
      Rear 8 degrees and 26 degrees
      Lateral part 22 degrees and 14 degrees

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Overall width 3330 mm 2. Overall width 3330 mm
      3. Height to cab upper part 3730 mm 3. Height to cab upper part 4000 mm
      5. Clearance 710 mm 5. Clearance 770 mm

      Carrier

      7. Shoe dimensions 610 mm 7. Shoe dimensions 609.6 mm

      Booms

      9. Minimum cutting radius 3250 mm 9. Minimum cutting radius 5030 mm
      10. Maximum cutting radius 8380 mm 10. Maximum cutting radius 8360 mm