- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat LX830C vs. Tigercat L845C
Tigercat LX830C vs. Tigercat L845C
4 reasons to buy Tigercat LX830C:
Sizes
| Clearance | 710 mm and 685 mm | 4 % more or 25 mm |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 205.1 kW | 8 % more or 18.6 kW |
Booms
| Maximum cutting radius | 8380 mm and 8050 mm | 4 % more or 330 mm |
| Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm and 4165 mm | 22 % less or 915 mm |
5 reasons to buy Tigercat L845C:
Operation
| Operational weight without attachment | 32480 kg and 32660 kg | 1 % less or 180 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 530 l. | 45 % more or 440 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 190 l. and 165 l. | 13 % more or 25 l. |
| Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 110 amperes | 21 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm and 3690 mm |
| Overall width | 3330 mm and 3435 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | QSL9 and 906 |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 215 mm and 203.2 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 710 mm |
Booms
| Pin lifting at maximum radius | 4585 kg and 5170 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3690 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 710 mm | 5. Clearance | 685 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3435 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm |
Booms
| 9. Minimum cutting radius | 3250 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 4165 mm |
| 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8380 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8050 mm |