- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat LX870C vs. Caterpillar 532
Tigercat LX870C vs. Caterpillar 532
3 reasons to buy Tigercat LX870C:
Operation
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 530 l. | 45 % more or 440 l. |
Motor
Full power | 223.7 kW and 211.8 kW | 5 % more or 11.9 kW |
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 532:
Sizes
Clearance | 889 mm and 710 mm | 20 % more or 179 mm |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 300 l. and 190 l. | 37 % more or 110 l. |
Operational weight without attachment | 31450 kg and 34926.6 kg | 10 % less or 3476.6 kg |
Motor
Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm and 3962 mm |
Overall width | 3330 mm and 3200 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
Model | QSL9 and C9 ACERT |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 215 mm and 215.9 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
Booms
Pin lifting at maximum radius | 7850 kg and 7100 kg |
Alignment device
Front end | 20 degrees and 20 degrees |
Lateral part | 15 degrees and 11 degrees |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3200 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm |
5. Clearance | 710 mm | 5. Clearance | 889 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |