- Home/
- Comparison/
- Felling-and-Bunching Machine/
- Tigercat LX870C vs. John Deere 959J
Tigercat LX870C vs. John Deere 959J
4 reasons to buy Tigercat LX870C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
| Operational weight without attachment | 34926.6 kg and 36015.2 kg | 3 % less or 1088.6 kg |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 219 kW | 2 % more or 4.7 kW |
Booms
| Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm and 5180 mm | 7 % less or 380 mm |
5 reasons to buy John Deere 959J:
Sizes
| Clearance | 770 mm and 710 mm | 8 % more or 60 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 311 l. and 190 l. | 39 % more or 121 l. |
| Fuel Capacity | 1117 l. and 970 l. | 13 % more or 147 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 1900 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Booms
| Maximum cutting radius | 8530 mm and 8460 mm | 1 % more or 70 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3330 mm and 3330 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm and 4000 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and John Deere |
| Model | QSL9 and 6081H |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 215 mm and 216 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
Alignment device
| Lateral part | 15 degrees and 14 degrees |
| Front end | 20 degrees and 7 degrees |
| Rear | 7 degrees and 26 degrees |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 4000 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 710 mm | 5. Clearance | 770 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
| 9. Minimum cutting radius | 4800 mm | 9. Minimum cutting radius | 5180 mm |
| 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8460 mm | 10. Maximum cutting radius | 8530 mm |