- Home/
- Comparison/
- Forwarder/
- Eco Log 574B vs. Tigercat 1075
Eco Log 574B vs. Tigercat 1075
4 reasons to buy Eco Log 574B:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 145 l. and 128 l. | 12 % more or 17 l. |
| Generator current strength | 150 amperes and 140 amperes | 7 % more or 10 amperes |
Gear box
| Maximum speed | 25 km/h and 19.3 km/h | 23 % more or 5.7 km/h |
Cranes
| Maximum radius | 10000 mm and 7800 mm | 22 % more or 2200 mm |
3 reasons to buy Tigercat 1075:
Sizes
| Clearance | 735 mm and 650 mm | 12 % more or 85 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 190 l. and 150 l. | 21 % more or 40 l. |
Motor
| Power | 205.1 kW and 129.8 kW | 37 % more or 75.3 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Under logs pad
| Loading weight 8wd | 14000 kg and 20003.4 kg |
| Loading zone | 5 m2 and 6.3 m2 |
Sizes
| Under logs pad length | 5600 mm and 3300 mm |
| Length | 10506 mm and 10970 mm |
| Between tyres width | 2820 mm and 3360 mm |
| Height to crane upper part | 3860 mm and 3760 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
| Front/rear tyre size 8wd | 710/50x26.5 and 750/55x26.5 |
| Working weight 8wd | 16830 kg and 23149.1 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 3056E and 906 3 level |
Gear box
| Transmission type | hydrostatic mechanical shifting and Hydrostatic 2 speed transmission |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length | 10506 mm | 1. Length | 10970 mm |
| 2. Between tyres width | 2820 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 3360 mm |
| 3. Height to crane upper part | 3860 mm | 3. Height to crane upper part | 3760 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 650 mm | 5. Clearance | 735 mm |
| 6. Under logs pad length | 5600 mm | 6. Under logs pad length | 3300 mm |