- Home/
- Comparison/
- Forwarder/
- Tigercat 1065 vs. Eco Log 564B
Tigercat 1065 vs. Eco Log 564B
3 reasons to buy Tigercat 1065:
Sizes
| Clearance | 735 mm and 659 mm | 10 % more or 76 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 190 l. and 150 l. | 21 % more or 40 l. |
Motor
| Power | 190.2 kW and 129.8 kW | 32 % more or 60.4 kW |
4 reasons to buy Eco Log 564B:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 145 l. and 128 l. | 12 % more or 17 l. |
| Generator current strength | 150 amperes and 140 amperes | 7 % more or 10 amperes |
Gear box
| Maximum speed | 25 km/h and 19.3 km/h | 23 % more or 5.7 km/h |
Cranes
| Maximum radius | 10000 mm and 7800 mm | 22 % more or 2200 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Under logs pad
| Loading weight 8wd | 17998.5 kg and 12000 kg |
| Loading zone | 5.1 m2 and 4.3 m2 |
Sizes
| Length | 10970 mm and 9038 mm |
| Between tyres width | 3280 mm and 3795 mm |
| Height to crane upper part | 3760 mm and 3685 mm |
| Under logs pad length | 3200 mm and 4100 mm |
Operation
| Working weight 8wd | 21151 kg and 125900 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
| Front/rear tyre size 8wd | 750/55x26.5 and 710/50x26.5 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Caterpillar |
| Model | 906 3 level and 3056E |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Hydrostatic 2 speed transmission and hydrostatic mechanical shifting |
Images
Sizes
| 6. Under logs pad length | 3200 mm | 6. Under logs pad length | 4100 mm |
| 1. Length | 10970 mm | 1. Length | 9038 mm |
| 2. Between tyres width | 3280 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 3795 mm |
| 3. Height to crane upper part | 3760 mm | 3. Height to crane upper part | 3685 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 735 mm | 5. Clearance | 659 mm |