- Home/
- Comparison/
- Forwarder/
- Tigercat 1065 vs. Eco Log 574B
Tigercat 1065 vs. Eco Log 574B
3 reasons to buy Tigercat 1065:
Sizes
Clearance | 735 mm and 650 mm | 12 % more or 85 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 190 l. and 150 l. | 21 % more or 40 l. |
Motor
Power | 190.2 kW and 129.8 kW | 32 % more or 60.4 kW |
4 reasons to buy Eco Log 574B:
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 145 l. and 128 l. | 12 % more or 17 l. |
Generator current strength | 150 amperes and 140 amperes | 7 % more or 10 amperes |
Gear box
Maximum speed | 25 km/h and 19.3 km/h | 23 % more or 5.7 km/h |
Cranes
Maximum radius | 10000 mm and 7800 mm | 22 % more or 2200 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Under logs pad
Loading weight 8wd | 17998.5 kg and 14000 kg |
Loading zone | 5.1 m2 and 5 m2 |
Sizes
Between tyres width | 3280 mm and 2820 mm |
Under logs pad length | 3200 mm and 5600 mm |
Height to crane upper part | 3760 mm and 3860 mm |
Length | 10970 mm and 10506 mm |
Operation
Working weight 8wd | 21151 kg and 16830 kg |
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Front/rear tyre size 8wd | 750/55x26.5 and 710/50x26.5 |
Motor
Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Caterpillar |
Model | 906 3 level and 3056E |
Gear box
Transmission type | Hydrostatic 2 speed transmission and hydrostatic mechanical shifting |
Images
Sizes
2. Between tyres width | 3280 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2820 mm |
3. Height to crane upper part | 3760 mm | 3. Height to crane upper part | 3860 mm |
5. Clearance | 735 mm | 5. Clearance | 650 mm |
6. Under logs pad length | 3200 mm | 6. Under logs pad length | 5600 mm |
1. Length | 10970 mm | 1. Length | 10506 mm |