- Home/
- Comparison/
- Forwarder/
- Tigercat 1065 vs. Komatsu 830.3
Tigercat 1065 vs. Komatsu 830.3
8 reasons to buy Tigercat 1065:
Sizes
Clearance | 735 mm and 622 mm | 15 % more or 113 mm |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 128 l. and 80 l. | 37 % more or 48 l. |
Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 110 amperes | 21 % more or 30 amperes |
Fuel Capacity | 190 l. and 100 l. | 47 % more or 90 l. |
Motor
Power | 190.2 kW and 99.9 kW | 47 % more or 90.3 kW |
Cranes
Maximum radius | 7800 mm and 6850 mm | 12 % more or 950 mm |
Torque under full lifting force | 150970.3 Nm and 74027.7 Nm | 51 % more or 76942.6 Nm |
Full rotary motion torque | 41013.5 Nm and 21896.5 Nm | 47 % more or 19117.0 Nm |
1 reasons to buy Komatsu 830.3:
Gear box
Maximum speed | 25 km/h and 19.3 km/h | 23 % more or 5.7 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Under logs pad
Loading zone | 5.1 m2 and 4.1 m2 |
Sizes
Length | 10970 mm and 8122 mm |
Between tyres width | 3280 mm and 2650 mm |
Height to crane upper part | 3760 mm and 3526 mm |
Under logs pad length | 3200 mm and 2300 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Front/rear tyre size 8wd | 750/55x26.5 and 600/50x22.5 |
Motor
Model | 906 3 level and 44 CWA 3 level |
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Hydraulic system
Type of pump | axial piston pumps with variable displacement and load sensing single loop with variable load piston pump |
Gear box
Transmission type | Hydrostatic 2 speed transmission and hydrostatic |
Cranes
Type of crane | Loglift F111-F78 with telescopic handle and CRF 5 |
Images
Sizes
1. Length | 10970 mm | 1. Length | 8122 mm |
2. Between tyres width | 3280 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2650 mm |
3. Height to crane upper part | 3760 mm | 3. Height to crane upper part | 3526 mm |
5. Clearance | 735 mm | 5. Clearance | 622 mm |
6. Under logs pad length | 3200 mm | 6. Under logs pad length | 2300 mm |