- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Caterpillar 501 vs. Tigercat LH830C
Caterpillar 501 vs. Tigercat LH830C
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar 501:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 227.1 l. and 165 l. | 27 % more or 62.1 l. |
| Generator current strength | 160 amperes and 110 amperes | 31 % more or 50 amperes |
4 reasons to buy Tigercat LH830C:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 490 l. and 378.5 l. | 23 % more or 111.5 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 120.1 kW | 46 % more or 103.6 kW |
Carrier
| Clearance | 760 mm and 610 mm | 20 % more or 150 mm |
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm and 6400.8 mm | 28 % more or 2514.2 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 2591 mm and 3330 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3327 mm and 3730 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 15875.7 kg and 32658.6 kg |
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | 3056E DITAAC and QSL9 |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 560 mm and 609.6 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 2591 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3327 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm |
Carrier
| 5. Clearance | 610 mm | 5. Clearance | 760 mm |
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 560 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 6400.8 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm |