- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Caterpillar 511 vs. Caterpillar 552
Caterpillar 511 vs. Caterpillar 552
8 reasons to buy Caterpillar 552:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1181 l. and 530 l. | 55 % more or 651 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 370 l. and 300 l. | 19 % more or 70 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 210.3 kW and 170 kW | 19 % more or 40.3 kW |
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 184.2 kW | 19 % more or 43.2 kW |
Carrier
| Clearance | 889 mm and 762 mm | 14 % more or 127 mm |
| Caterpillar track length | 4903 mm and 4572 mm | 7 % more or 331 mm |
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 11300 mm and 9800 mm | 13 % more or 1500 mm |
| Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 5700 kg and 4100 kg | 28 % more or 1600 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3378 mm and 3962 mm |
| Overall width | 3200 mm and 3327 mm |
Operation
| Cooling system fluid volume | 61 l. and 61 l. |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
| Generator current strength | 95 amperes and 95 amperes |
| Working weight | 23790 kg and 36000 kg |
| Engine oil volume | 39 l. and 39 l. |
Motor
| Model | C9 ACERT and C9 ACERT |
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 2100 rev / min |
| Displacement | 8.8 l. and 8.8 l. |
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Caterpillar |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 203.2 mm and 215.9 mm |
| Track width | 2591 mm and 2591 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 711 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3200 mm | 2. Overall width | 3327 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3378 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm |
Carrier
| 4. Caterpillar track length | 4572 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length | 4903 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 762 mm | 5. Clearance | 889 mm |
| 6. Track width | 2591 mm | 6. Track width | 2591 mm |
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 711 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 9800 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 11300 mm |