- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Caterpillar 521 vs. Tigercat LH870C
Caterpillar 521 vs. Tigercat LH870C
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 521:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 300 l. and 190 l. | 37 % more or 110 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track length | 4801 mm and 4750 mm | 1 % more or 51 mm |
| Clearance | 838 mm and 710 mm | 15 % more or 128 mm |
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 9800 mm and 9400 mm | 4 % more or 400 mm |
4 reasons to buy Tigercat LH870C:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 530 l. | 45 % more or 440 l. |
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 211.8 kW | 5 % more or 11.9 kW |
Booms
| Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 5360 kg and 4100 kg | 24 % more or 1260 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3556 mm and 3710 mm |
| Overall width | 3200 mm and 3330 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 26050 kg and 35924.5 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | C9 ACERT and QSL9 |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 203.2 mm and 215 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3556 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3200 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
Carrier
| 4. Caterpillar track length | 4801 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length | 4750 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 838 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 9800 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 9400 mm |