- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Caterpillar 532 vs. Tigercat H860C
Caterpillar 532 vs. Tigercat H860C
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 532:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 300 l. and 190 l. | 37 % more or 110 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track length | 4893 mm and 4450 mm | 9 % more or 443 mm |
| Clearance | 889 mm and 710 mm | 20 % more or 179 mm |
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 9800 mm and 9400 mm | 4 % more or 400 mm |
4 reasons to buy Tigercat H860C:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 530 l. | 45 % more or 440 l. |
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 211.8 kW | 5 % more or 11.9 kW |
Booms
| Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 5360 kg and 4100 kg | 24 % more or 1260 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm and 3301 mm |
| Overall width | 3200 mm and 3275 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
| Working weight | 31450 kg and 27623.8 kg |
Motor
| Model | C9 ACERT and QSL9 |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 215.9 mm and 200 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3200 mm | 2. Overall width | 3275 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3301 mm |
Carrier
| 5. Clearance | 889 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
| 4. Caterpillar track length | 4893 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length | 4450 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 9800 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 9400 mm |