- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Caterpillar 551 vs. Tigercat LH822C
Caterpillar 551 vs. Tigercat LH822C
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 551:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1181 l. and 530 l. | 55 % more or 651 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 370 l. and 165 l. | 55 % more or 205 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW | 2 % more or 3.7 kW |
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 11300 mm and 8915 mm | 21 % more or 2385 mm |
| Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 5000 kg and 4015 kg | 20 % more or 985 kg |
1 reasons to buy Tigercat LH822C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3658 mm and 3730 mm |
| Overall width | 3327 mm and 3400 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 31377 kg and 31330 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | C9 ACERT and QSL9 |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 215.9 mm and 203.2 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 711 mm and 710 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3327 mm | 2. Overall width | 3400 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3658 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 711 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 11300 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm |