- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Caterpillar 552 vs. Madill 800
Caterpillar 552 vs. Madill 800
8 reasons to buy Caterpillar 552:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 95 amperes and 70 amperes | 26 % more or 25 amperes |
| Fuel Capacity | 1181 l. and 870.6 l. | 26 % more or 310.4 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 370 l. and 155.2 l. | 58 % more or 214.8 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 138 kW | 39 % more or 89.4 kW |
Carrier
| Clearance | 889 mm and 711.2 mm | 20 % more or 177.8 mm |
| Caterpillar track length | 4903 mm and 4343.4 mm | 11 % more or 559.6 mm |
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 11300 mm and 8686.8 mm | 23 % more or 2613.2 mm |
| Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 5700 kg and 4989.5 kg | 12 % more or 710.5 kg |
1 reasons to buy Madill 800:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm and 3709.4 mm |
| Overall width | 3327 mm and 3301 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
| Working weight | 36000 kg and 30163.9 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | C9 ACERT and QSB.5.9 |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 711 mm and 660.4 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3327 mm | 2. Overall width | 3301 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3962 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3709.4 mm |
Carrier
| 4. Caterpillar track length | 4903 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length | 4343.4 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 889 mm | 5. Clearance | 711.2 mm |
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 711 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 660.4 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 11300 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 8686.8 mm |