vs.

      Caterpillar 552 vs. Tigercat H822C

      7 reasons to buy Caterpillar 552:

      Operation

      Fuel Capacity 1181 l. and 490 l. 59 % more or 691 l.
      Hydraulic system fluid volume 370 l. and 165 l. 55 % more or 205 l.

      Motor

      Full power 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW 2 % more or 3.7 kW
      Power measured at 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min 14 % more or 300 rev

      Carrier

      Clearance 889 mm and 760 mm 15 % more or 129 mm

      Booms

      Maximum radius with head 11300 mm and 8920 mm 21 % more or 2380 mm
      Lifting capacity at maximum radius 5700 kg and 3790 kg 34 % more or 1910 kg

      1 reasons to buy Tigercat H822C:

      Operation

      Generator current strength 110 amperes and 95 amperes 14 % more or 15 amperes

      Neutral reasons:

      Sizes

      Height to cab upper part 3962 mm and 3330 mm
      Overall width 3327 mm and 3435 mm

      Operation

      Operating voltage 24 V and 24 V
      Working weight 36000 kg and 24494 kg

      Motor

      Model C9 ACERT and QSL9
      Manufacturer Caterpillar and Cummins

      Carrier

      Caterpillar track pitch 215.9 mm and 200 mm
      Shoe dimensions 711 mm and 609.6 mm

      Images

      Sizes

      2. Overall width 3327 mm 2. Overall width 3435 mm
      3. Height to cab upper part 3962 mm 3. Height to cab upper part 3330 mm

      Carrier

      7. Shoe dimensions 711 mm 7. Shoe dimensions 609.6 mm
      5. Clearance 889 mm 5. Clearance 760 mm

      Booms

      8. Maximum radius with head 11300 mm 8. Maximum radius with head 8920 mm