- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- John Deere 703G vs. Tigercat LH822C
John Deere 703G vs. Tigercat LH822C
4 reasons to buy John Deere 703G:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 584 l. and 530 l. | 9 % more or 54 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 197 l. and 165 l. | 16 % more or 32 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2000 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 10 % more or 200 rev |
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 9910 mm and 8915 mm | 10 % more or 995 mm |
3 reasons to buy Tigercat LH822C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 135 kW | 40 % more or 88.7 kW |
Carrier
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 2940 mm and 3400 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3400 mm and 3730 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
| Working weight | 20601 kg and 31330 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | John Deere and Cummins |
| Model | 6081H and QSL9 |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 190 mm and 203.2 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 710 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 2940 mm | 2. Overall width | 3400 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3400 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 9910 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm |