- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- John Deere 703G vs. Tigercat LH830C
John Deere 703G vs. Tigercat LH830C
4 reasons to buy John Deere 703G:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 584 l. and 490 l. | 16 % more or 94 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 197 l. and 165 l. | 16 % more or 32 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2000 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 10 % more or 200 rev |
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 9910 mm and 8915 mm | 10 % more or 995 mm |
4 reasons to buy Tigercat LH830C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 135 kW | 40 % more or 88.7 kW |
Carrier
| Clearance | 760 mm and 711 mm | 6 % more or 49 mm |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3400 mm and 3730 mm |
| Overall width | 2940 mm and 3330 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 20601 kg and 32658.6 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | John Deere and Cummins |
| Model | 6081H and QSL9 |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 190 mm and 215 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 609.6 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 2940 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3400 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm |
Carrier
| 5. Clearance | 711 mm | 5. Clearance | 760 mm |
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 9910 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm |