- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- John Deere 753G vs. Tigercat LH870C
John Deere 753G vs. Tigercat LH870C
3 reasons to buy John Deere 753G:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 197 l. and 190 l. | 4 % more or 7 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2000 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 10 % more or 200 rev |
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 9910 mm and 9400 mm | 5 % more or 510 mm |
6 reasons to buy Tigercat LH870C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 584 l. | 40 % more or 386 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 180 kW | 20 % more or 43.7 kW |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track length | 4750 mm and 4420 mm | 7 % more or 330 mm |
| Clearance | 710 mm and 690 mm | 3 % more or 20 mm |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3450 mm and 3710 mm |
| Overall width | 3150 mm and 3330 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
| Working weight | 23053 kg and 35924.5 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | John Deere and Cummins |
| Model | 6081H and QSL9 |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 203 mm and 215 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3150 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3450 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm |
Carrier
| 4. Caterpillar track length | 4420 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length | 4750 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 690 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 9910 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 9400 mm |