- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- John Deere 909JH vs. Tigercat H860C
John Deere 909JH vs. Tigercat H860C
7 reasons to buy John Deere 909JH:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 1117 l. and 970 l. | 13 % more or 147 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 311 l. and 190 l. | 39 % more or 121 l. |
Motor
Power measured at | 2000 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 10 % more or 200 rev |
Carrier
Caterpillar track length | 4920 mm and 4450 mm | 10 % more or 470 mm |
Clearance | 735 mm and 710 mm | 3 % more or 25 mm |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 10 and 8 | 20 % more or 2 |
Booms
Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 6350 kg and 5360 kg | 16 % more or 990 kg |
3 reasons to buy Tigercat H860C:
Operation
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
Full power | 223.7 kW and 219.2 kW | 2 % more or 4.5 kW |
Booms
Maximum radius with head | 9400 mm and 8839.2 mm | 6 % more or 560.8 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 4000 mm and 3301 mm |
Overall width | 3330 mm and 3275 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 35300 kg and 27623.8 kg |
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | John Deere and Cummins |
Model | 6081H, 2 level and QSL9 |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3275 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 4000 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3301 mm |
Carrier
4. Caterpillar track length | 4920 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length | 4450 mm |
5. Clearance | 735 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
8. Maximum radius with head | 8839.2 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 9400 mm |