- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- John Deere 909JH vs. Tigercat LH830C
John Deere 909JH vs. Tigercat LH830C
5 reasons to buy John Deere 909JH:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 1117 l. and 490 l. | 56 % more or 627 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 311 l. and 165 l. | 47 % more or 146 l. |
Motor
Power measured at | 2000 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 10 % more or 200 rev |
Carrier
Rolling bearings number on either side | 10 and 9 | 10 % more or 1 |
Booms
Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 6350 kg and 3790 kg | 40 % more or 2560 kg |
4 reasons to buy Tigercat LH830C:
Operation
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
Full power | 223.7 kW and 219.2 kW | 2 % more or 4.5 kW |
Carrier
Clearance | 760 mm and 735 mm | 3 % more or 25 mm |
Booms
Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm and 8839.2 mm | 1 % more or 75.8 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Forward bend | 27 degrees and 26 degrees |
Lateral tilt | 18 degrees and 22 degrees |
Height to cab upper part | 4000 mm and 3730 mm |
Overall width | 3330 mm and 3330 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 35300 kg and 32658.6 kg |
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | John Deere and Cummins |
Model | 6081H, 2 level and QSL9 |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 609.6 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 4000 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm |
Carrier
5. Clearance | 735 mm | 5. Clearance | 760 mm |
7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm |
Booms
8. Maximum radius with head | 8839.2 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm |