- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Madill 1800 vs. Ponsse Ergo
Madill 1800 vs. Ponsse Ergo
1 reasons to buy Madill 1800:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1003.1 l. and 400 l. | 60 % more or 603.1 l. |
5 reasons to buy Ponsse Ergo:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 350 l. and 189.3 l. | 46 % more or 160.7 l. |
| Generator current strength | 160 amperes and 70 amperes | 56 % more or 90 amperes |
| Maximum speed | 28 km/h and 4.8 km/h | 83 % more or 23.2 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 205 kW and 152.9 kW | 25 % more or 52.1 kW |
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 10000 mm and 9144 mm | 9 % more or 856 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3785.6 mm and 3770 mm |
| Overall width | 3453.4 mm and 2840 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
| Working weight | 33565.8 kg and 16000 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | QSB.5.9 and OM906LA |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3453.4 mm | 2. Overall width | 2840 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3785.6 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3770 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 9144 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 10000 mm |