- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Madill 800 vs. Tigercat H855C
Madill 800 vs. Tigercat H855C
1 reasons to buy Madill 800:
Carrier
Clearance | 711.2 mm and 690 mm | 3 % more or 21.2 mm |
6 reasons to buy Tigercat H855C:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 945 l. and 870.6 l. | 8 % more or 74.4 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 190 l. and 155.2 l. | 18 % more or 34.8 l. |
Generator current strength | 140 amperes and 70 amperes | 50 % more or 70 amperes |
Motor
Full power | 205.1 kW and 138 kW | 33 % more or 67.1 kW |
Booms
Maximum radius with head | 9400 mm and 8686.8 mm | 8 % more or 713.2 mm |
Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 5360 kg and 4989.5 kg | 7 % more or 370.5 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 3709.4 mm and 3290 mm |
Overall width | 3301 mm and 3435 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 30163.9 kg and 27623.8 kg |
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
Manufacturer | Cummins and Mercedes-Benz |
Model | QSB.5.9 and 906 |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 660.4 mm and 610 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3301 mm | 2. Overall width | 3435 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3709.4 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3290 mm |
Carrier
5. Clearance | 711.2 mm | 5. Clearance | 690 mm |
7. Shoe dimensions | 660.4 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
8. Maximum radius with head | 8686.8 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 9400 mm |


