- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Madill HT2250B vs. Tigercat H822C
Madill HT2250B vs. Tigercat H822C
4 reasons to buy Madill HT2250B:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 946.4 l. and 490 l. | 48 % more or 456.4 l. |
Motor
Full power | 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW | 2 % more or 3.7 kW |
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
Carrier
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
3 reasons to buy Tigercat H822C:
Operation
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 70 amperes | 36 % more or 40 amperes |
Carrier
Clearance | 760 mm and 736.6 mm | 3 % more or 23.4 mm |
Booms
Maximum radius with head | 8920 mm and 8610.6 mm | 3 % more or 309.4 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 3910.6 mm and 3330 mm |
Overall width | 3453.4 mm and 3435 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 36514.2 kg and 24494 kg |
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSL 9 l and QSL9 |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm and 609.6 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3453.4 mm | 2. Overall width | 3435 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3910.6 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm |
Carrier
5. Clearance | 736.6 mm | 5. Clearance | 760 mm |
7. Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm |
Booms
8. Maximum radius with head | 8610.6 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 8920 mm |


