- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Madill HT2250B vs. Tigercat LH830C
Madill HT2250B vs. Tigercat LH830C
3 reasons to buy Madill HT2250B:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 946.4 l. and 490 l. | 48 % more or 456.4 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW | 2 % more or 3.7 kW |
3 reasons to buy Tigercat LH830C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 70 amperes | 36 % more or 40 amperes |
Carrier
| Clearance | 760 mm and 736.6 mm | 3 % more or 23.4 mm |
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm and 8610.6 mm | 3 % more or 304.4 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Forward bend | 27 degrees and 26 degrees |
| Height to cab upper part | 3910.6 mm and 3730 mm |
| Overall width | 3453.4 mm and 3330 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 36514.2 kg and 32658.6 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSL 9 l and QSL9 |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm and 609.6 mm |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 9 |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3453.4 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3910.6 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 711.2 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 736.6 mm | 5. Clearance | 760 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 8610.6 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm |