- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Ponsse Bear vs. Madill 800
Ponsse Bear vs. Madill 800
3 reasons to buy Ponsse Bear:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 350 l. and 155.2 l. | 56 % more or 194.8 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 240 kW and 138 kW | 42 % more or 102 kW |
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 11000 mm and 8686.8 mm | 21 % more or 2313.2 mm |
2 reasons to buy Madill 800:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 870.6 l. and 400 l. | 54 % more or 470.6 l. |
Carrier
| Clearance | 711.2 mm and 615 mm | 14 % more or 96.2 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3860 mm and 3709.4 mm |
| Overall width | 2990 mm and 3301 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 24500 kg and 30163.9 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Cummins |
| Model | OM926LA and QSB.5.9 |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 2990 mm | 2. Overall width | 3301 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3860 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3709.4 mm |
Carrier
| 5. Clearance | 615 mm | 5. Clearance | 711.2 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 11000 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 8686.8 mm |