- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Ponsse Bear vs. Tigercat H822C
Ponsse Bear vs. Tigercat H822C
3 reasons to buy Ponsse Bear:
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 350 l. and 165 l. | 53 % more or 185 l. |
Motor
Full power | 240 kW and 223.7 kW | 7 % more or 16.3 kW |
Booms
Maximum radius with head | 11000 mm and 8920 mm | 19 % more or 2080 mm |
2 reasons to buy Tigercat H822C:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 490 l. and 400 l. | 18 % more or 90 l. |
Carrier
Clearance | 760 mm and 615 mm | 19 % more or 145 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 3860 mm and 3330 mm |
Overall width | 2990 mm and 3435 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 24500 kg and 24494 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Cummins |
Model | OM926LA and QSL9 |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 2990 mm | 2. Overall width | 3435 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3860 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm |
Carrier
5. Clearance | 615 mm | 5. Clearance | 760 mm |
Booms
8. Maximum radius with head | 11000 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 8920 mm |