- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Tigercat H822C vs. Caterpillar 521
Tigercat H822C vs. Caterpillar 521
2 reasons to buy Tigercat H822C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 211.8 kW | 5 % more or 11.9 kW |
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 521:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 530 l. and 490 l. | 8 % more or 40 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 300 l. and 165 l. | 45 % more or 135 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Carrier
| Clearance | 838 mm and 760 mm | 9 % more or 78 mm |
Booms
| Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 4100 kg and 3790 kg | 8 % more or 310 kg |
| Maximum radius with head | 9800 mm and 8920 mm | 9 % more or 880 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm and 3556 mm |
| Overall width | 3435 mm and 3200 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 24494 kg and 26050 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | QSL9 and C9 ACERT |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 200 mm and 203.2 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm and 610 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3435 mm | 2. Overall width | 3200 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3556 mm |
Carrier
| 5. Clearance | 760 mm | 5. Clearance | 838 mm |
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 8920 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 9800 mm |