- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Tigercat H822C vs. Caterpillar 551
Tigercat H822C vs. Caterpillar 551
1 reasons to buy Tigercat H822C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 551:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 1181 l. and 490 l. | 59 % more or 691 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 370 l. and 165 l. | 55 % more or 205 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW | 2 % more or 3.7 kW |
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 11300 mm and 8920 mm | 21 % more or 2380 mm |
| Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 5000 kg and 3790 kg | 24 % more or 1210 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3435 mm and 3327 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm and 3658 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 24494 kg and 31377 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | QSL9 and C9 ACERT |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 200 mm and 215.9 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm and 711 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3435 mm | 2. Overall width | 3327 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3658 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 711 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 8920 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 11300 mm |