- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Tigercat H822C vs. Tigercat LH830C
Tigercat H822C vs. Tigercat LH830C
1 reasons to buy Tigercat H822C:
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 8920 mm and 8915 mm | 0 % more or 5 mm |
1 reasons to buy Tigercat LH830C:
Carrier
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm and 3730 mm |
| Overall width | 3435 mm and 3330 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 165 l. and 165 l. |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 110 amperes |
| Working weight | 24494 kg and 32658.6 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 490 l. and 490 l. |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSL9 and QSL9 |
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 223.7 kW |
| Power measured at | 1800 rev / min and 1800 rev / min |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 200 mm and 215 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm and 609.6 mm |
| Clearance | 760 mm and 760 mm |
Booms
| Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 3790 kg and 3790 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3435 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm |
Carrier
| 5. Clearance | 760 mm | 5. Clearance | 760 mm |
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 8920 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm |