- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Tigercat H822C vs. Tigercat LH870C
Tigercat H822C vs. Tigercat LH870C
1 reasons to buy Tigercat H822C:
Carrier
Clearance | 760 mm and 710 mm | 7 % more or 50 mm |
5 reasons to buy Tigercat LH870C:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 490 l. | 49 % more or 480 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 190 l. and 165 l. | 13 % more or 25 l. |
Carrier
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
Booms
Maximum radius with head | 9400 mm and 8920 mm | 5 % more or 480 mm |
Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 5360 kg and 3790 kg | 29 % more or 1570 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3435 mm and 3330 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm and 3710 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 24494 kg and 35924.5 kg |
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 110 amperes |
Motor
Power measured at | 1800 rev / min and 1800 rev / min |
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSL9 and QSL9 |
Full power | 223.7 kW and 223.7 kW |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 200 mm and 215 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm and 610 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3435 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3330 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm |
Carrier
5. Clearance | 760 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
8. Maximum radius with head | 8920 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 9400 mm |