- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Tigercat H860C vs. John Deere 753JH
Tigercat H860C vs. John Deere 753JH
7 reasons to buy Tigercat H860C:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 583 l. | 40 % more or 387 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 190 l. and 136.3 l. | 28 % more or 53.7 l. |
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 179.7 kW | 20 % more or 44.0 kW |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track length | 4450 mm and 4419.6 mm | 1 % more or 30.4 mm |
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 9400 mm and 8458.2 mm | 10 % more or 941.8 mm |
| Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 5360 kg and 3980 kg | 26 % more or 1380 kg |
1 reasons to buy John Deere 753JH:
Carrier
| Clearance | 740 mm and 710 mm | 4 % more or 30 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3301 mm and 3453.4 mm |
| Overall width | 3275 mm and 3176 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 27623.8 kg and 23251.1 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and John Deere |
| Model | QSL9 and e 6081H, 2 level |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 8 and 8 |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3275 mm | 2. Overall width | 3176 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3301 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3453.4 mm |
Carrier
| 4. Caterpillar track length | 4450 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length | 4419.6 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 710 mm | 5. Clearance | 740 mm |
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 9400 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 8458.2 mm |