- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Tigercat H860C vs. Madill HT2200B
Tigercat H860C vs. Madill HT2200B
4 reasons to buy Tigercat H860C:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 946.4 l. | 2 % more or 23.6 l. |
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 70 amperes | 36 % more or 40 amperes |
Carrier
| Clearance | 710 mm and 685.8 mm | 3 % more or 24.2 mm |
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 9400 mm and 8610.6 mm | 8 % more or 789.4 mm |
3 reasons to buy Madill HT2200B:
Motor
| Full power | 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW | 2 % more or 3.7 kW |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track length | 4495.8 mm and 4450 mm | 1 % more or 45.8 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3301 mm and 3810 mm |
| Overall width | 3275 mm and 3252.2 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 27623.8 kg and 33384.4 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSL9 and QSL 9 l |
Carrier
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 8 and 8 |
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 609.6 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3275 mm | 2. Overall width | 3252.2 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3301 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3810 mm |
Carrier
| 4. Caterpillar track length | 4450 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length | 4495.8 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 710 mm | 5. Clearance | 685.8 mm |
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 9400 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 8610.6 mm |