- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Tigercat H860C vs. Tigercat LH870C
Tigercat H860C vs. Tigercat LH870C
2 reasons to buy Tigercat LH870C:
Carrier
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
| Caterpillar track length | 4750 mm and 4450 mm | 6 % more or 300 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3301 mm and 3710 mm |
| Overall width | 3275 mm and 3330 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 27623.8 kg and 35924.5 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 970 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 190 l. and 190 l. |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 110 amperes |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSL9 and QSL9 |
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 223.7 kW |
| Power measured at | 1800 rev / min and 1800 rev / min |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 610 mm |
| Clearance | 710 mm and 710 mm |
| Caterpillar track pitch | 200 mm and 215 mm |
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 9400 mm and 9400 mm |
| Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 5360 kg and 5360 kg |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3301 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3275 mm | 2. Overall width | 3330 mm |
Carrier
| 4. Caterpillar track length | 4450 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length | 4750 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 710 mm | 5. Clearance | 710 mm |
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 9400 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 9400 mm |