- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Tigercat LH822C vs. Caterpillar 501
Tigercat LH822C vs. Caterpillar 501
3 reasons to buy Tigercat LH822C:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 530 l. and 378.5 l. | 29 % more or 151.5 l. |
Motor
Full power | 223.7 kW and 120.1 kW | 46 % more or 103.6 kW |
Booms
Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm and 6400.8 mm | 28 % more or 2514.2 mm |
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar 501:
Operation
Generator current strength | 160 amperes and 110 amperes | 31 % more or 50 amperes |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 227.1 l. and 165 l. | 27 % more or 62.1 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm and 3327 mm |
Overall width | 3400 mm and 2591 mm |
Operation
Operating voltage | 24 V and 12 V |
Working weight | 31330 kg and 15875.7 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
Model | QSL9 and 3056E DITAAC |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 710 mm and 560 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3400 mm | 2. Overall width | 2591 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3327 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 560 mm |
Booms
8. Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 6400.8 mm |


