- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Tigercat LH822C vs. Madill 1800
Tigercat LH822C vs. Madill 1800
2 reasons to buy Tigercat LH822C:
Operation
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 70 amperes | 36 % more or 40 amperes |
Motor
Full power | 223.7 kW and 152.9 kW | 32 % more or 70.8 kW |
5 reasons to buy Madill 1800:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 1003.1 l. and 530 l. | 47 % more or 473.1 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 189.3 l. and 165 l. | 13 % more or 24.3 l. |
Motor
Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 18 % more or 400 rev |
Booms
Maximum radius with head | 9144 mm and 8915 mm | 3 % more or 229 mm |
Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 4626.6 kg and 4015 kg | 13 % more or 611.6 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm and 3785.6 mm |
Overall width | 3400 mm and 3453.4 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 31330 kg and 33565.8 kg |
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | QSL9 and QSB.5.9 |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 710 mm and 6604000 mm |
Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 9 |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3400 mm | 2. Overall width | 3453.4 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3785.6 mm |
Carrier
7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 6604000 mm |
Booms
8. Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 9144 mm |


