- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Tigercat LH830C vs. Caterpillar 511
Tigercat LH830C vs. Caterpillar 511
2 reasons to buy Tigercat LH830C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 184.2 kW | 18 % more or 39.5 kW |
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 511:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 530 l. and 490 l. | 8 % more or 40 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 300 l. and 165 l. | 45 % more or 135 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Carrier
| Clearance | 762 mm and 760 mm | 0 % more or 2 mm |
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 9800 mm and 8915 mm | 9 % more or 885 mm |
| Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 4100 kg and 3790 kg | 8 % more or 310 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm and 3378 mm |
| Overall width | 3330 mm and 3200 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 32658.6 kg and 23790 kg |
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Model | QSL9 and C9 ACERT |
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm and 610 mm |
| Caterpillar track pitch | 215 mm and 203.2 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3200 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3378 mm |
Carrier
| 5. Clearance | 760 mm | 5. Clearance | 762 mm |
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 9800 mm |