- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Tigercat LH830C vs. John Deere 759G
Tigercat LH830C vs. John Deere 759G
3 reasons to buy Tigercat LH830C:
Operation
| Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 80 amperes | 27 % more or 30 amperes |
Motor
| Full power | 223.7 kW and 180 kW | 20 % more or 43.7 kW |
Carrier
| Rolling bearings number on either side | 9 and 8 | 11 % more or 1 |
4 reasons to buy John Deere 759G:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 584 l. and 490 l. | 16 % more or 94 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 197 l. and 165 l. | 16 % more or 32 l. |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2000 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 10 % more or 200 rev |
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 9490 mm and 8915 mm | 6 % more or 575 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Forward bend | 26 degrees and 27 degrees |
| Lateral tilt | 22 degrees and 20 degrees |
| Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm and 3780 mm |
| Overall width | 3330 mm and 3050 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
| Working weight | 32658.6 kg and 26090 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and John Deere |
| Model | QSL9 and 6081H |
Carrier
| Caterpillar track pitch | 215 mm and 203 mm |
| Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm and 610 mm |
| Clearance | 760 mm and 760 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3050 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3780 mm |
Carrier
| 5. Clearance | 760 mm | 5. Clearance | 760 mm |
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 9490 mm |