- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Tigercat LH830C vs. Valmet 445.EXL
Tigercat LH830C vs. Valmet 445.EXL
1 reasons to buy Tigercat LH830C:
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm and 6530 mm | 27 % more or 2385 mm |
2 reasons to buy Valmet 445.EXL:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 681 l. and 490 l. | 28 % more or 191 l. |
Booms
| Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 5216 kg and 3790 kg | 27 % more or 1426 kg |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3330 mm and 3150 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm and 3810 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 32658.6 kg and 28408 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSL9 and QSC |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm and 600 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3150 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3810 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 609.6 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 6530 mm |