- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Tigercat LH870C vs. Caterpillar 551
Tigercat LH870C vs. Caterpillar 551
2 reasons to buy Tigercat LH870C:
Operation
Generator current strength | 110 amperes and 95 amperes | 14 % more or 15 amperes |
Booms
Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 5360 kg and 5000 kg | 7 % more or 360 kg |
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 551:
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 1181 l. and 970 l. | 18 % more or 211 l. |
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 370 l. and 190 l. | 49 % more or 180 l. |
Motor
Full power | 227.4 kW and 223.7 kW | 2 % more or 3.7 kW |
Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
Carrier
Caterpillar track length | 4903 mm and 4750 mm | 3 % more or 153 mm |
Booms
Maximum radius with head | 11300 mm and 9400 mm | 17 % more or 1900 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3330 mm and 3327 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm and 3658 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 35924.5 kg and 31377 kg |
Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
Model | QSL9 and C9 ACERT |
Carrier
Caterpillar track pitch | 215 mm and 215.9 mm |
Shoe dimensions | 610 mm and 711 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3330 mm | 2. Overall width | 3327 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3710 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3658 mm |
Carrier
4. Caterpillar track length | 4750 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length | 4903 mm |
7. Shoe dimensions | 610 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 711 mm |
Booms
8. Maximum radius with head | 9400 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 11300 mm |