- Home/
- Comparison/
- Harvester/
- Valmet 425.EXL vs. Tigercat LH822C
Valmet 425.EXL vs. Tigercat LH822C
2 reasons to buy Valmet 425.EXL:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 681 l. and 530 l. | 22 % more or 151 l. |
Booms
| Lifting capacity at maximum radius | 5216 kg and 4015 kg | 23 % more or 1201 kg |
1 reasons to buy Tigercat LH822C:
Booms
| Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm and 6530 mm | 27 % more or 2385 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3760 mm and 3730 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 24495 kg and 31330 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSC and QSL9 |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 600 mm and 710 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3760 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3730 mm |
Carrier
| 7. Shoe dimensions | 600 mm | 7. Shoe dimensions | 710 mm |
Booms
| 8. Maximum radius with head | 6530 mm | 8. Maximum radius with head | 8915 mm |