- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- Caterpillar 320D FM vs. John Deere 335C
Caterpillar 320D FM vs. John Deere 335C
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar 320D FM:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 11.5 rev / min and 9 rev / min | 22 % more or 2.5 rev |
| Swing torque | 61840.2 Nm and 41600 Nm | 33 % more or 20240.2 Nm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 410 l. and 341 l. | 17 % more or 69 l. |
5 reasons to buy John Deere 335C:
Sizes
| Clearance | 971.5 mm and 650 mm | 33 % more or 321.5 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 378 l. and 260 l. | 31 % more or 118 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 127 kW and 117.1 kW | 8 % more or 9.9 kW |
| Displacement | 6.8 l. and 6.4 l. | 6 % more or 0.4 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 560 l/min and 410 l/min | 27 % more or 150 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 4657 mm and 4090 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 2774 mm and 2570 mm |
| Overall width | 3290 mm and 2493 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 30300 kg and 12020 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and John Deere |
| Model | C6.4 and 6068T |
| Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 34990.9 kPa and 15850 kPa |
Images
Sizes
| 5. Clearance | 650 mm | 5. Clearance | 971.5 mm |
| 7. Height to cab upper part | 4657 mm | 7. Height to cab upper part | 4090 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2774 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2570 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3290 mm | 2. Overall width | 2493 mm |