- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- Caterpillar 320D FM vs. Tigercat S860C
Caterpillar 320D FM vs. Tigercat S860C
2 reasons to buy Caterpillar 320D FM:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 11.5 rev / min and 7 rev / min | 39 % more or 4.5 rev |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 260 l. and 190 l. | 27 % more or 70 l. |
5 reasons to buy Tigercat S860C:
Sizes
| Clearance | 795 mm and 650 mm | 18 % more or 145 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 410 l. | 58 % more or 560 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 223.7 kW and 117.1 kW | 48 % more or 106.6 kW |
Boom/section specifications 1
| Load-transfer height | 3300 mm and 3185 mm | 3 % more or 115 mm |
| Maximum radius on ground level | 10870 mm and 10000 mm | 8 % more or 870 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3290 mm and 3630 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 30300 kg and 33660 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | C6.4 and QSL9 |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 700 mm and 915 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3290 mm | 2. Overall width | 3630 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 650 mm | 5. Clearance | 795 mm |
Boom/section specifications 1
| 3. Load-transfer height | 3185 mm | 3. Load-transfer height | 3300 mm |
| 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 10000 mm | 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 10870 mm |