- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- Caterpillar 325D FM vs. John Deere 335C
Caterpillar 325D FM vs. John Deere 335C
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 325D FM:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 10 rev / min and 9 rev / min | 10 % more or 1 rev |
| Swing torque | 86316.8 Nm and 41600 Nm | 52 % more or 44716.8 Nm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 520 l. and 341 l. | 34 % more or 179 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 152.1 kW and 127 kW | 17 % more or 25.1 kW |
| Displacement | 7.2 l. and 6.8 l. | 6 % more or 0.4 l. |
3 reasons to buy John Deere 335C:
Sizes
| Clearance | 971.5 mm and 740 mm | 24 % more or 231.5 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 378 l. and 260 l. | 31 % more or 118 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 560 l/min and 470 l/min | 16 % more or 90 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3620 mm and 2493 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 4820 mm and 4090 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 3020 mm and 2570 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 37806.9 kg and 12020 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and John Deere |
| Model | C7 Acert and 6068T |
| Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 34990.9 kPa and 15850 kPa |
Images
Sizes
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 3020 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2570 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 3620 mm | 2. Overall width | 2493 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 740 mm | 5. Clearance | 971.5 mm |
| 7. Height to cab upper part | 4820 mm | 7. Height to cab upper part | 4090 mm |