- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- Caterpillar 325D FM vs. Tigercat 220C
Caterpillar 325D FM vs. Tigercat 220C
7 reasons to buy Caterpillar 325D FM:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 10 rev / min and 7 rev / min | 30 % more or 3 rev |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 520 l. and 378 l. | 27 % more or 142 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 260 l. and 225 l. | 13 % more or 35 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 152.1 kW and 119.3 kW | 22 % more or 32.8 kW |
Boom/section specifications 1
| Load-transfer length | 14840 mm and 4570 mm | 69 % more or 10270 mm |
| Maximum radius on ground level | 11500 mm and 8430 mm | 27 % more or 3070 mm |
| Maximum height | 13200 mm and 7600 mm | 42 % more or 5600 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3620 mm and 2590 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 3020 mm and 2310 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 37806.9 kg and 11657.3 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | C7 Acert and QSB6.7 3 level |
Boom/section specifications 1
| Option - Boom/Section 1 | Under/Under and boom |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3620 mm | 2. Overall width | 2590 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 3020 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2310 mm |
Boom/section specifications 1
| 1. Load-transfer length | 15720 mm | 1. Load-transfer length | 4570 mm |
| 9. Maximum height | 14000 mm | 9. Maximum height | 7600 mm |
| 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 12000 mm | 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 8430 mm |