- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- Caterpillar 325D FM vs. Tigercat S860C
Caterpillar 325D FM vs. Tigercat S860C
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 325D FM:
Swing device
Rotation speed | 10 rev / min and 7 rev / min | 30 % more or 3 rev |
Operation
Hydraulic system fluid volume | 260 l. and 190 l. | 27 % more or 70 l. |
Boom/section specifications 1
Load-transfer height | 3340 mm and 3300 mm | 1 % more or 40 mm |
Maximum radius on ground level | 11500 mm and 10870 mm | 5 % more or 630 mm |
3 reasons to buy Tigercat S860C:
Sizes
Clearance | 795 mm and 740 mm | 7 % more or 55 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 970 l. and 520 l. | 46 % more or 450 l. |
Motor
Effective power | 223.7 kW and 152.1 kW | 32 % more or 71.6 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall width | 3620 mm and 3630 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 37806.9 kg and 33660 kg |
Motor
Model | C7 Acert and QSL9 |
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
Carrier
Shoe dimensions | 700 mm and 915 mm |
Images
Sizes
2. Overall width | 3620 mm | 2. Overall width | 3630 mm |
5. Clearance | 740 mm | 5. Clearance | 795 mm |
Boom/section specifications 1
3. Load-transfer height | 3340 mm | 3. Load-transfer height | 3300 mm |
10. Maximum radius on ground level | 11500 mm | 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 10870 mm |