- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- Caterpillar 330D FM vs. Tigercat 250B
Caterpillar 330D FM vs. Tigercat 250B
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar 330D FM:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 600 l. and 300 l. | 50 % more or 300 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 410 l. and 245 l. | 40 % more or 165 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 199.8 kW and 152.9 kW | 23 % more or 46.9 kW |
Boom/section specifications 1
| Maximum radius on ground level | 12800 mm and 9750 mm | 24 % more or 3050 mm |
| Maximum height | 15000 mm and 7600 mm | 49 % more or 7400 mm |
1 reasons to buy Tigercat 250B:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 9 rev / min and 6.3 rev / min | 30 % more or 2.7 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3650 mm and 2590 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 3490 mm and 2790 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 24 V |
| Generator current strength | 80 amperes and 80 amperes |
| Working weight | 45801 kg and 16465.4 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | C9 Acert and QSB6.7 3 level |
Boom/section specifications 1
| Option - Boom/Section 1 | Under/Under and boom |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3650 mm | 2. Overall width | 2590 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 3490 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2790 mm |
Boom/section specifications 1
| 9. Maximum height | 15600 mm | 9. Maximum height | 7600 mm |
| 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 13500 mm | 10. Maximum radius on ground level | 9750 mm |