- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- John Deere 435C vs. Caterpillar 320D FM
John Deere 435C vs. Caterpillar 320D FM
3 reasons to buy John Deere 435C:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 378 l. and 260 l. | 31 % more or 118 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 127 kW and 117.1 kW | 8 % more or 9.9 kW |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 617 l/min and 410 l/min | 34 % more or 207 l/min |
3 reasons to buy Caterpillar 320D FM:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 11.5 rev / min and 10 rev / min | 13 % more or 1.5 rev |
| Swing torque | 61840.2 Nm and 48809 Nm | 21 % more or 13031.2 Nm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 410 l. and 285 l. | 30 % more or 125 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 2493 mm and 3290 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 13381 kg and 30300 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | John Deere and Caterpillar |
| Model | 6068T and C6.4 |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 18615.8 kPa and 34990.9 kPa |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 2493 mm | 2. Overall width | 3290 mm |