- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- John Deere 437C vs. Caterpillar 324D FM
John Deere 437C vs. Caterpillar 324D FM
2 reasons to buy John Deere 437C:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 378 l. and 245 l. | 35 % more or 133 l. |
| Generator current strength | 95 amperes and 80 amperes | 16 % more or 15 amperes |
6 reasons to buy Caterpillar 324D FM:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 10 rev / min and 8.5 rev / min | 15 % more or 1.5 rev |
| Swing torque | 73413.5 Nm and 48809 Nm | 34 % more or 24604.5 Nm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 520 l. and 341 l. | 34 % more or 179 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 140.2 kW and 127 kW | 9 % more or 13.2 kW |
| Displacement | 7.2 l. and 6.8 l. | 6 % more or 0.4 l. |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 1665.6 l/min and 443 l/min | 73 % more or 1222.6 l/min |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Rear platform swing radius | 2570 mm and 2940 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 4090 mm and 4790 mm |
| Overall width | 2493 mm and 3620 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 13381 kg and 34300 kg |
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 24 V |
Motor
| Model | 6068T and C7 Acert |
| Manufacturer | John Deere and Caterpillar |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 24980 kPa and 34990.9 kPa |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 2493 mm | 2. Overall width | 3620 mm |
| 7. Height to cab upper part | 4090 mm | 7. Height to cab upper part | 4790 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2570 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2940 mm |