- Home/
- Comparison/
- Timber Loader/
- Link-Belt 240LX vs. Caterpillar 320D FM
Link-Belt 240LX vs. Caterpillar 320D FM
6 reasons to buy Link-Belt 240LX:
Swing device
| Swing torque | 99001.8 Nm and 61840.2 Nm | 38 % more or 37161.6 Nm |
Sizes
| Clearance | 705 mm and 650 mm | 8 % more or 55 mm |
Operation
| Cooling system fluid volume | 27 l. and 25 l. | 7 % more or 2 l. |
Motor
| Displacement | 6.5 l. and 6.4 l. | 2 % more or 0.1 l. |
| Effective power | 120.8 kW and 117.1 kW | 3 % more or 3.7 kW |
Hydraulic system
| Pump bandwidth | 424 l/min and 410 l/min | 3 % more or 14 l/min |
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 320D FM:
Swing device
| Rotation speed | 11.5 rev / min and 8.2 rev / min | 29 % more or 3.3 rev |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 410 l. and 340 l. | 17 % more or 70 l. |
| Engine oil volume | 30 l. and 24 l. | 20 % more or 6 l. |
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 260 l. and 225 l. | 13 % more or 35 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Overall width | 3643 mm and 3290 mm |
| Rear platform swing radius | 2936 mm and 2774 mm |
| Caterpillar track length on ground level | 3910 mm and 3715 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 33926 kg and 30300 kg |
Motor
| Cylinders number | 6 and 6 |
| Manufacturer | Isuzu and Caterpillar |
| Model | BB-6BG1T and C6.4 |
Hydraulic system
| Overflow valve pressure | 34266.9 kPa and 34990.9 kPa |
Carrier
| Shoe dimensions | 700 mm and 700 mm |
| Track width | 2943 mm and 2590 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Overall width | 3643 mm | 2. Overall width | 3290 mm |
| 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 3910 mm | 4. Caterpillar track length on ground level | 3715 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 705 mm | 5. Clearance | 650 mm |
| 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2936 mm | 8. Rear platform swing radius | 2774 mm |
Carrier
| 6. Track width | 2943 mm | 6. Track width | 2590 mm |